What Are Some of The Main Advantages Of Using Metal Buildings in Texas Instead of Traditional Construction?
Using steel as a primary building material is a choice that is growing in popularity among companies and residents with a need for additional space. Steel, an iron-carbon alloy, is used for a wide range of purposes ranging from heavy industry to the household, and is practical for many applications. Did you know that many Metal Buildings in Texas have various advantages over the more traditional wood and concrete structures, and the benefits range from the relative ease of construction all the way to environmental issues.
The durability, flexibility and strength of steel make it an attractive option for many different types of buildings. In the past, steel buildings in Texas were mostly associated with impersonal storage structures such as warehouses, silos or aircraft hangars. It is not uncommon to encounter a church, retail outlet, sports arena or office building that is primarily constructed of steel. New options in exterior finishes and facades mean that steel structures need no longer look like a barn or a hangar. Steel is still a great choice for buildings that have a lot of clearspan space, meaning the roof is supported by bordering walls and framework, not internal columns, but that is no longer the only option.
Here Are Some Other Interesting Facts About Metal Building Construction In Texas:
Because its pieces are prefabricated and engineering to be assembled easily, a steel structure requires less specialized labour in its assembly, and the whole building process can be completed in less time. A steel building can become productive more quickly than a wood or concrete structure. In the long run, steel results in lowered repair costs due to its durability. Though steel’s main enemy is rust and corrosion, technological developments in metallic and organic coatings can ensure that the structure will stand the test of time.
More and more purchasers today are opting for prefab metal building kits. And why not? With all of the advantages that these building kits offer, it would almost seem to be a mistake to choose any other construction method.
But how can one decide which type of kit is best suited to your needs? Is a pre-engineered metal building the right option? Would a panelized metal stud building kit be a better choice? What about a metal arch kit? Or a fabric covered metal frame kit?
It is up to you the purchaser to complete your 'due diligence' to ensure that you understand the differences, the benefits and the drawbacks to each building type in order to make the best choice for your building needs. For that, you need to do some research to see what each of the products is like.
Pre-engineered steel buildings can have large open areas, but can be more difficult to finish the interior. Panelized metal stud building kits when erected resemble a steel version of a conventional wood stud building which can have as many as six or seven stories in height (great for office buildings and condos). Metal arch buildings have a user-friendly erection process but it's more difficult and costly to have window and door opening on the building sides.
All metal building kits have the advantage to the purchaser of being prefabricated in whole or in part in a factory environment. This, of course, means that a higher level of quality control can be achieved. It’s this fact alone that should put purchasers at ease. It also means that the purchaser must have all accessories and special loadings accounted for 'up-front'. Once these prefab building kits leave the plant, it may be difficult to make changes that affect the structure.
If you are having your building kit erected by a contractor, it is important that you feel comfortable in dealing with that contractor. You may find that you feel uneasy in dealing with the contractor with a very good reputation. This combination will only spell more stress for you during the erection process and may have you second guessing what has been done.
If I have one parting thought for you it's this: Do your homework. Understand what is available to you in each building kit. Understand what requirements you have for your new metal building. Evaluate carefully the benefits and shortcomings of your options. Only then can you make a stress free, informed decision.
Ever Wondered How Steel Buildings Are Manufactured?
I’m dying. This isn’t news I received from a doctor, it’s just the truth. I hate to break it to you, but you’re dying too. In fact, we can be fairly certain that almost anyone reading this will have taken their last breath by the end of this century. Believe it or not, the same holds true for our buildings.
I’m not stating this out of some obsession with death. I don’t have a fatalist sense that life will pass me by without a chance to leave a strong legacy for the generations that follow. Rather, I’m concerned that the places we are building won’t do the same.
A large percentage of our built environment has a surprisingly high “mortality” rate. In fact, the lifespan of a building — made of concrete, steel, wood — is shorter than that of a flesh-and-blood human. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, the average office building lifespan in 2008 was 73 years. In contrast, human life expectancy in the U.S. was 78 years. Given their similar life expectancy, one would assume we spend a comparable amount of money on a person’s shelter as we do on other essential aspects of their life, right?
The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimated in 2008 the average cost of living on food, shelter, transportation, and healthcare to be around $35,000 per year — or more than $2.7 million during a 78-year lifetime. We spend that on ourselves simply to survive. And what about the office environment where, for 45 of those 78 years, we will devote more than 50% of our waking hours? We currently spend around $200 per square foot for a conventional office building, with each worker needing roughly 200 square feet to do their job (direct work, collaboration, breaks, storage, etc.). That’s a total cost of $40,000 per person for every new building built. Additionally, according to the Building Owners and Managers Association, the average annual operating costs are about $8/sf (or $1,600/sf per person each year), which over a 45-year career yields a total operating cost per person of $72,000. In total, we’re allocating about $112,000 per person on buildings during an individual’s career.
The quick math? We spend 24x less on the facilities shaping our daily experience and health than we do on the bodies that inhabit them. Yet I’ll wager most people expect buildings to outlive them many times over.
This seems like a misalignment worth exploring, especially as we aspire to improve the health of both our cities and their citizens. Are we expecting too much from our buildings, or are we not spending enough money on them? Either way, here are two approaches that may help us start the uncomfortable conversation on the merits of “architectural euthanasia.”
Long Live the Short-Lived
As humans we’re predestined, eventually, to return to earth, ashes, and dust. Based on their similar lifespan, should buildings have the same fate? When buildings cease to change, when they cease to give back, when they cease to learn, they die. Yet we have a tendency to put them on life support, often for long periods of time. Instead of investing in “permanent” materials that, ironically, will be deconstructed in less than a century, let’s instead focus on lightweight, rapidly constructible and dismantle-able solutions as part of a flexible, component-driven system.
For instance, lightweight tensile structures are deployed throughout the globe to house sports, social venues and even laboratories, and can more broadly be considered for day-lit envelopes or inflatable facilities that disappear when not in use. Or imagine the beauty — both literal and figural — of exterior walls where reusable felt panels become both insulation and rain screen. Explorations in paper materials such as cardboard have become more prevalent, while 3-D printing affords us the opportunity to experiment with soluble materials that simply wash away after serving their purpose.
Materials for short-term buildings don’t necessarily have to be less durable, but they likely need to perform more than one function. A single material serving as structure, enclosure and window is faster and simpler to assemble — and therefore more likely to encourage a project to go up or come down. Perhaps we can learn a thing or two from millennia of nomadic lifestyles.
We started designing for human health centuries ago, and the outcome on the built environment has been noticeable. The term euthenics — the study of the improvement of human functioning and well-being by the improvement of living conditions — was coined in the 1890s when society began to stress the importance of natural light, fresh air and open space in the buildings that shape everyone’s daily life. Cast-iron façades and long-span timber elements were effective approaches to freeing up both the exterior and the floor plan. Not by coincidence, the buildings that succeeded in doing this best a hundred years ago are some of today’s most sought-after real estate investments.
Some of our biggest challenges with structures derive from our failure to foresee the continual changes that occur in how we live and work. Architecture that uses an exoskeleton — or structural elements on the exterior — is a strong first step towards accommodating such change, eliminating internal columns and walls that often constrain the uses around them. Moment connections at columns can do the same while enabling future flexibility for the placement of elevator cores and floor openings. Taller floor-to-floor heights invite daylight deeper into a space — making it more comfortable and usable — while providing a greater range of opportunities for evolving programmatic needs, from offices, to residences, to loft-like workspaces or even labs or industrial use.
Interestingly, it’s not the materials in long-term buildings that need to be more durable, but rather the forward-thinking ideas about how space will be used. Perhaps this conceptual trajectory might force us to rethink our criteria for sustainable features, so that conversion and adaptive reuse would trump bicycle storage and recycled materials.
We can spend less on shelter and, like buying furniture at Ikea, know we will get something that is decently crafted but will last only a few years. Or we can spend more on design, materials, mechanical systems, exterior walls, floor-to-floor heights, and so on and guarantee that our buildings will outlive us and the generations to follow.
Think of it like the sell-by on a grocery item. Perishable foods must be used up quickly, while shelf-stable foods are labeled for the longer term, packaged as nutritional insurance for the future. Perhaps it’s time we establish the same expectations for our buildings, designing with the knowledge that they, too, have an expiration date.
- Metal Building House Kits Aldine
- Metal Office Buildings Alvin
- Metal Building House Kits Angleton
- Metal Building Construction Atascocita
- Engineered Metal Buildings Bay City
- Steel Church Buildings Baytown
- Steel Residential Buildings Beaumont
- Metal Building Construction Bellaire
- Metal Office Buildings Brookshire
- Top Rated Metal Buildings Center
- Steel Church Buildings Channelview
- Large Metal Buildings Cinco Ranch
- Engineered Metal Buildings Cloverleaf
- Prefabricated Structures Clute
- Best Metal Buildings Conroe
- Out Building Kits Cypress
- Metal Buildings Dayton
- Metal Building House Kits Deer Park
- Fair Priced Metal Buildings Dickinson
- Metal Building Construction Dyersdale
- Prefab Building Kits East
- Out Building Kits Eastern
- Fair Priced Metal Buildings El Campo
- Prefab Shop Buildings Four Corners
- Metal Home Building Kits Freeport
- Engineered Metal Buildings Fresno
- Steel Residential Buildings Friendswood
- Metal Building House Kits Fulshear
- Price Metal Buildings Galena Park
- Fair Priced Metal Buildings Galveston
- Steel Church Buildings Greatwood
- Large Metal Buildings Groves
- Fair Priced Metal Buildings Hempstead
- Prefabricated Structures Highlands
- Metal Home Kits Prices Houston
- Metal Office Buildings Hudson
- Prefabricated Structures Humble
- Large Metal Buildings Jacinto City
- Prefab Building Kits Jacksonville
- Top Rated Metal Buildings Jersey Village
- Metal Building Construction Katy
- Metal Buildings Cost Kingwood
- Fair Priced Metal Buildings La Marque
- Metal Home Kits Prices La Porte
- Metal Home Building Kits Lake Jackson
- Top Rated Metal Buildings League City
- Metal Buildings Cost Liberty
- Metal Buildings Livingston
- Metal Buildings Cost Lufkin
- Engineered Metal Buildings Lumberton
- Metal Buildings Meadows Place
- Metal Building Supply Mission Bend
- Metal Buildings Quote Missouri City
- Best Metal Buildings Mont Belvieu
- Great Metal Buildings Nacogdoches
- Metal Home Building Kits Navasota
- Prefab Building Kits Nederland
- Metal Building House Kits Needville
- Price Metal Buildings New Territory
- Metal Building Construction Newton
- Steel Residential Buildings Orange
- Price Metal Buildings Pasadena
- Metal Building House Kits Pearland
- Metal Office Buildings Pecan Grove
- Prefab Metal Buildings Port Arthur
- Steel Residential Buildings Port Lavaca
- Metal Building Construction Prairie View
- Fair Priced Metal Buildings Richmond
- Out Building Kits Rosenberg
- Metal Home Kits Prices Santa Fe
- Prefab Building Kits Seabrook
- Metal Buildings Sealy
- Prefab Shop Buildings Silsbee
- Metal Building Construction South Houston
- Prefab Building Kits Spring
- Great Metal Buildings Stafford
- Great Metal Buildings Sugar Land
- Steel Church Buildings Texas City
- Metal Building Construction The Woodlands
- Metal Buildings Quote Tomball
- Steel Church Buildings Vidor
- Price Metal Buildings Webster
- Price Metal Buildings West Livingston
- Prefabricated Structures West University Place
- Metal Buildings Quote Wharton
- Best Metal Buildings Winnie
- Out Building Kits Woodville